Friday 1 July 2011 by Emma Campbell. 4 comments
News

In the early morning of 1 July 1916, more than 100,000 British infantrymen were ordered from their trenches in the fields and woods north of the Somme River in France, to attack the opposing German line.

Within 24 hours, the British army would suffer almost 60,000 casualties, a third of whom were killed, and record the most costly day in its history.

Today marks the 95th anniversary of the start of the Somme offensive, a series of fierce and ultimately futile battles that consumed the British, Australian and Dominion forces for much of 1916. The offensive was eventually abandoned on 18 November with staggering troop losses and little ground gained.

The assault was originally planned as a joint French–British offensive which was part of a wider strategy of attacking Germany simultaneously on the Western and Eastern Fronts, with the aim of destroying Germany’s reserves of manpower. The massive German attack launched on the French fortress of Verdun on 21 February 1916 significantly reduced the French contribution to the Somme campaign, which was also being launched, in part, to divert the Germans’ attention from Verdun. Britain’s “new army’’ – a volunteer force similar to the AIF – was required to step up.

“At the start of 1916, the French called on the Brits to play a bigger role on the ground, which they agree to do at the Somme,” explains Peter Burness, a senior historian at the Memorial. “But these were not professional forces, or large conscript ones such as the German and French armies were – these were men from all walks of life who joined up in their communities.” Hundreds of men from communities large and small would join up together, give their units nicknames such as “Pals”, and die together, leaving their towns and villages devastated.

Britain’s generals lacked confidence in the abilities of their men, which meant there was a distinct lack of imagination or innovation in the tactics employed.

“The application of artillery was still rather simple in 1916: to bombard the enemy’s position, then send in the infantry and charge through after with the cavalry,” Burness says. “The British and French were always looking for the breakthrough, to fracture the enemy and drive them out. They wanted to see the Germans in disarray, to make a wild retreat.”

The Germans, however, were deeply entrenched on the Somme. They had been honing their defences and their war weapons since the trench line zig-zagged its way across France and Belgium in the autumn of 1914. The Germans had built an impregnable and sophisticated wall of barbed wire, deep dugouts and machine-gun posts on favourable locations in difficult country. They had a formidable position on the Somme, and the British underestimated their preparedness.

Despite days of shelling immediately before the assault on 1 July, the British were unable to smash the German dugouts, and belts of wire remained uncut. The Germans also had many guns that outranged those of the British, or were kept silent and well hidden until the offensive began.

In his memoir The old front line, British poet laureate John Masefield, who spent months at the front, includes a German’s account of the start of the assault, at 7.30 am on July 1:

They came on at a steady easy pace as if expecting to find nothing alive in our front trenches ... a few minutes later, when the leading British line was within 100 yards, the rattle of machine-guns and rifle fire broke out from along the whole line of craters.

The advance rapidly crumpled under this hail of shells and bullets. All along the line men could be seen throwing their arms into the air and collapsing never to move again. Badly wounded rolled about in their agony, and others less severely injured crawled to the nearest shell-hole. The noise of battle became indescribable ... Again and again the extended lines of British infantry broke against the German defence like waves against a cliff, only to be beaten back. It was an amazing spectacle of un-exampled gallantry, courage and bull-dog determination on both sides.

All along the 30-kilometre front, the same annihilation was taking place. In his book, The first day on the Somme, Martin Middlebrook records the experience of Private W. Slater, 18th Battalion, West Yorkshire Regiment (known as the 2nd Bradford Pals):

For some reason nothing seemed to happen to us at first; we strolled along as though walking in a park. Then, suddenly, we were in the midst of a storm of machine-gun bullets and I saw men beginning to twirl round and fall in all kinds of curious ways as they were hit – quite unlike the way actors do it in films.

The first day of the Somme offensive has a relevance to the British today that is akin to the landing at Gallipoli for Australians.

“It was a day of high hope and expectation, and it ended in disaster,” Burness says. “To a new generation, that realisation had a real impact. There was so much expectation that was destroyed on the battlefield.”

Despite the enormous losses of that first battle at the Somme, the offensive continued through summer and a particularly wet autumn until the first snow fell on 18 November 1916. The Australian Imperial Force, consisting of men who had fought at Gallipoli and fresh volunteers from home, arrived at the Somme in late July.

The major contribution of Australian troops to the Somme offensive was in the fighting around Pozières between 23 July and 3 September. The 1st, 2nd and 4th Australian Divisions suffered more than 24,000 casualties at Pozières, including 6,741 dead. Official war correspondent C.E.W. Bean described the small village as “more densely sown with Australian sacrifice than any other place on earth”.

When the Somme offensive ended, the allied forces had managed to advance only 12 kilometres. It had come at a cost of 430,000 British and Dominion troops and 200,000 French casualties. The offensive destroyed Britain’s mass volunteer army, and for the rest of the war it would be reliant upon conscription for reinforcements. It had also resulted in heavy German casualties, about 230,000 according to current scholarship. The German army never recovered from its loss of experienced junior officers and non-commisisoned officers on the Somme. To those who fought there, and for the present generation, the Somme was synonymous with slaughter.

More information

Comments

Marin Kovcic

Dear All; I have a Letter opener, that was made during the First World WAR re: 1914 to 1918 and It has the NAME of E. Cartier with a FRENCH Soilders officers hat on the top of it, It was given to me buy my Grand farther in-law, it looks like a Officers Letter opener that he would have been given to use Or it could be a TRENCH ART War Letter opener, but the craftmanship and the thickness of the BRASS sudgests it's what a officer get's after the war is over, at least that is what my Late Grand father in-law said to me, now by the way served in the Australian Army in the first world war. So my questions are as follows: a) Do you have simular Artifact's b) Is it Possiable through a European War Records to find the TRUE Fact's of the artifact, please provide link's, as i have tried, via the websites, but with no success. c) I have just being Diagonsed with CANCER & i want to go to The National War Memorial in Canberra, i live in Ballarat & all help re: the artifact, was NIL, so i am hopping to bring World WAR 2 Photos & Vietnam Photos, which include Pictures of Auzzie Diggers with JAP ZEROS & see what and if they can be looked after and what they are worth etc. Kindest Regards Mr. Marin KOVCIC

Brian Curragh

I am sorry to see this kind of outdated analysis being published by the Australian War Memorial - your readers deserve better from you than a mindless repetition of views that originate in the 1960s but have been discredited by more recent research and analysis. At the very least, Gary Sheffield's "Forgotten Victory and Bill Philpott's "Bloody Victory" counter this retrograde viewpoint.

Aimee Fox

"All along the 30-kilometre front, the same annihilation was taking place." This is a misleading generalisation. Both the British 18th (Eastern) Division and 30th Division achieved all their objectives by the afternoon of 1 July 1916. It is disappointing to see that, aside from Peter Burness' contribution, the only other referenced sources are Martin Middlebrook's "The First Day of the Somme" and John Masefield's "The Old Front Line". How about incorporating Robin Prior and Trevor Wilson's "The Somme", Gary Sheffield's "The Somme", or William Philpott's "Bloody Victory"? Historiography has moved on from Middlebrook and Masefield. It is important that national institutions concerned with the remembrance of conflict present an objective, reasoned account of events by incorporating the most up to date scholarship.

George A. Webster

Who wrote this drivel - surely not a military historian in the employ of the AWM? I can only assume that it was cobbled together by someone in the PR or media department who hasn't got a clue. I cannot believe that respected Australian military historians of the Great War such as Peter Pederson, Aaron Pegram or Chris Roberts would be impressed with the AWM disseminating online such academically discredited views of the Somme. This needs to be taken down and rewritten by someone who is up to speed on the research on the Western Front which has taken place over the last thirty years and more since the nonsense regurgitated in this article was being peddled by clowns like John Laffin, Alan Clark and Basil Liddell Hart. Get a grip on what you put online, AWM!