Pattern 1908 Web Equipment

14 July 2015 by Eleni Holloway

Pattern 1908 web equipment with water bottle and bayonet frog. The entrenching tool helve which should be positioned next to the bayonet frog is missing. This set of equipment was issued to Private William George Hoffman, 32 Battalion. Private Hoffman wore this web equipment during an attack on the Hindenburg Line near Bellicourt on 29 September to 1 October 1918. He returned to Australia in 1919. RELAWM07759.001


This is part of a series of blogs by the Military Heraldry & Technology section about First World War webbing and equipment. This blog will look at the British Mills 1908 Pattern web equipment issued to and used by the Australian Naval and Military Expedition Force and the Australian Imperial Force, and some of the items, tools and personal equipment carried by soldiers. This is not meant to be an exhaustive account of the history of 1908 web equipment, its manufacturing variations or modifications, but will provide a general introduction and visual reference.

From 1914 the Australian infantryman was officially supplied with a set of khaki cotton 1908 Pattern webbing; a different type of leather webbing known as bandolier equipment was carried by mounted troops of the Light Horse.

The 1908 webbing allowed a range of equipment, tools and ammunition to be attached and carried by Australian soldiers when marching or fighting. The webbing consisted of a wide belt which supported the following: shoulder straps, two sets of five connected ammunition pouches (configured for the left and right side), a small haversack, a water bottle carrier, frog to hold bayonet scabbard and an entrenching tool carrier. Each strap was finished with a brass tongue to easily engage the brass buckles on the equipment.

AIF soldier, 1915, Gallipoli gallery, 'Australia in the Great War' exhibition, AWM


The Pattern 1908 increased the carrying capacity of a soldier and distributed the increased weight evenly across the body from the main waist belt. With all of the components connected to the main waist belt the chest area was left unobstructed. The result, we are told in official orders, is that, ‘the whole of it can be taken off in one motion… men can turn out in barracks or camp fully equipped in a few moments, even in the dark’.

Unlike leather equipment which would shrink and slip when wet, the woven cotton was hardwearing and could withstand wet weather conditions. It did not require cleaning or polishing, just an occasional brushing down.

Issued with the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield .303 rifle and bayonet, a soldier was able to carry 150 rounds of ammunition in his ten pouches. The 1908 web equipment could be configured in two main ways, described in official instructions as fighting or marching arrangement.

The fighting arrangement consisted of:

  • Rifle with web
  • Bayonet and frog
  • Ammunition pouches
  • Entrenching tool and helve carrier
  • Water [water bottle] carrier in webbing
  • Emergency rations/ spoon/ fork in haversack
  • Kindling (an addition that was issued as required)
  • Small items of spare clothing [socks]
  • Steel helmet (from 1916)
  • Gas mask/ respirator (from 1916)

The marching arrangement or battle order, on the other hand consisted of additional clothing and articles surplus to the fighting arrangement. These additional articles comprised some of the following, and were to be carried in a readily removable pack:

  • Great coat strapped across pack
  • Additional clothing [cap comforter in pocket of great coat, socks]
  • Mess tin and cover
  • Tooth Brush
  • Shaving Brush
  • Razor
  • Comb
  • Towel
  • Soap
  • Housewife
  • Paybook
Pattern 1908 entrenching tool carrier. The entrenching tool comprised a metal spade [tool head] and a wooden helve [handle]. The head and helve were carried separately; the head in the webbing pouch and the helve sat above, secured between the two straps. The helve in this example is missing. RELAWM07759.004

Cast iron entrenching tool head. The wooden helve [handle] is missing. REL/13837


1908 Pattern water bottle and carrier. The water bottle made of blue enamelled steel and with khaki wool felt covering, is secured in the carrier with a press stud. RELAWM07759.006

Pattern 1908 haversack carried by Sergeant George Leslie Dolan, 53 Battalion. REL32948

Pattern 1908 pack used by Driver Roy Darrell Stuckey, 4 Field Company Engineers, during his service. REL33814

Pattern 07 bayonet scabbard and frog (bayonet missing). RELAWM07759.005

An example of kindling wood issued to Australian troops prior to the landing at Gallipoli. This bundle was collected by the Australian Historical Mission in 1919 at Quinn’s Post. RELAWM00355


In mid-1916, Australian soldiers on the Western Front were further issued with a British steel helmet (Brodie helmet), a gas mask and chest-mounted haversack, and Mills bombs (grenades) as part of the fighting arrangement. In response to gas attacks, gas masks were carried in a haversack around the neck for quick access, and a steel helmet reduced casualties in the trenches. This extra equipment added further weight to the original equipment issue, but was necessary to meet the change in conditions.

British pattern gas mask Respirator bag, used by Lieutenant Henry Nicholls Matthews, 2 Battalion. RELAWM13511


Unidentified soldiers wearing respirator bags around their necks, c 1917. A00793

British Brodie pattern steel helmet, c 1916. REL/00980


Pattern 1915 Australian Leather Equipment

British manufacturers of the pattern 1908 web equipment struggled to keep up with the logistical demands of an expanding army. In late 1915, Australia’s answer to a webbing shortage was found in the Commonwealth Government Harness Factory (C.G.H.F) and its contractors, whom began manufacturing its own version of the Pattern 1908 equipment in leather. The Pattern 1915 Leather Equipment replicated the original 1908 design.

Production in Australia began in late 1915 and drew to a close in late 1918. Over the four year period 178,000 complete sets of the 1915 Leather Equipment were made in Australia, in a variety of colours and finishes. The Commonwealth Government Harness Factory manufactured the greatest number of complete sets (118,000) at Clifton Hill, Melbourne.

The Pattern 1915 Leather Equipment was mainly used during the early stages of the war on the Western Front, and for training in Australia. However, it was found to be insufficient in wet conditions, uncomfortable and the leather stretched over time. The leather versions were not as water resistant as Pattern 1908 cotton webbing, and required higher maintenance. In wet weather, the brass buckles slipped, and adjusting the straps while wearing it proved difficult. Due to these design flaws, Pattern 1915 Leather Equipment was replaced with the 1908 web equipment as it became available.


AIF soldier sporting a complete set of Australian Pattern 1915 leather equipment. H13976



Assistant Curator Eleni Holloway, Military Heraldry & Technology


Further reading:

 ‘The Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equpiment’, Published by the War Office and Reprinted, Melbourne, 1911

‘Web Infantry Equpiment, Pattern 1908’, Kharkee Web, Available online.

Albert Lethern, and William Wise, ‘The Development of the Mills Woven Cartridge Belt 1877-1956’, The Mills Equipment Company Ltd.

Carl Woods, ‘The Pattern 1908 Web Equipment Infantry: Part Two’, Arms & Militaria Collector, Vol. 3, No. 4, p13-16

Carl Woods, ‘The Pattern 1908 Web Equipment Infantry: Part Two’, Arms & Militaria Collector, Vol. 3, No. 4, p31-36

Rick Landers, ‘Saddle Up: Australian Load Carrying Equipment of British, American & Local Origin’, 1998.